.

Berkeley Heights Council Votes Against BAC Sewer Amendment

Vote was 5-1 against allowing the proposed aquatic center in Warren to hook up to Berkeley Heights sewer system.

In a 5-1 vote, the Berkeley Heights town council has voted against amending town law to extend sewer service to the Berkeley Aquatic Club's proposed 51,000 square foot facility in neighboring Warren.

With the vote, the next step for the aquatic center is in doubt. The Independent Press reported that Councilman Ed Delia provided the one vote in favor of the ordinance.

Last month, a petition drive spearheaded by a public relations firm hired by the Aquatic Center garnered enough signatures to prompt the Berkeley Heights Town Council to vote on amending the rule. 

Berkeley Heights and Warren Township have an agreement that allows new residential structures in Warren Township to access the Berkeley Heights Sewage Treatment Facility, but not commercial structures such as the proposed BAC facility.

According to published reports, residents opposed to the project flocked to the meeting. Residents living near the proposed building say the facility would substantially increase traffic on Hillcrest Road and create a hazardous situation. Residents also claimed Emerson Lane would be used as a short cut and for overflow parking. They also claimed that the installation of the facility would substantially reduce their property values. 

Other residents in favor of the facility have claimed that allowing the BAC to tap into Berkeley Height's sewage would bring in revenue to offset taxes.

Harris Ruben December 05, 2012 at 03:06 PM
"Other residents in favor of the facility claimed that allowing the BAC to tap into Berkeley Height's sewage would bring in revenue to offset taxes." What meeting were you at? NO residents spoke in favor of the BAC, and it was pointed out that the hookup fee and use fees (touted by BAC as a great advantage to Berkeley Heights) were in fact insignificant and represented only about a quarter of one percent of the township budget, at most. The only person who spoke for the BAC was their lawyer, who spoke well over his allotted time and peppered his speech with veiled threats to the township.
Stephen Yellin December 06, 2012 at 06:20 PM
I was present at the meeting, as was Mr. Ruben, and he's correct in that the only residents who spoke on the issue were opposed to the BAC proposal. The BAC's attorney (Mr. Wolfson) was the only speaker for the proposal, and his statement was far more about what comes next than how the Council should vote and why.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something